Orbital Polisher

Tool DamageReference ShieldReference
Efficiency Score
17
Best Positioning (Quick Answer)
Placement: global effect (no slot requirement).
Trigger: global • Risk: None • Check: No
Orbital Polisher
Key Takeaways
  • Component — strongest when purchased with a plan, not as a blind buy.
  • Low friction: only 1 slot(s), easy to slot in during pivots.
  • Low placement risk: trigger is global, so disruption is less punishing.
Data & Methodology (How scores are calculated) Season 10

Efficiency: Efficiency Score is a normalized "space ROI" metric: (estimated effect value ÷ size slots). It is NOT raw DPS.

ROI: ROI estimates assume standard round pacing and compare this item against same-tier peers by cost and slot usage.

Percentile: Percentiles are computed within the same category/tier bucket (e.g., Tech items at similar cost).

Meta Strategic Position

The Orbital Polisher is best classified as Component. At 8g and 1 slot(s), it’s a placement-safe (global) item where timing matters.

Low-to-mid cost means it can be used as a tempo stabilizer if it fits your board plan. Low footprint makes it easy to slot in without breaking your grid.

Quick Conclusions

Verdict: Buy — based on efficiency 17 and cost 8g.
Trigger: global — placement-safe (won’t usually break).
Best synergy: 28 Hour Fitness (score 2 • shared tags: ShieldReference, DamageReference).


### Efficiency & ROI Analysis
Your efficiency score (17) is a *space ROI* signal, not raw DPS. This usually means it can carry a board plan if you can protect space and scale it. If you’re behind on board stability, delay the purchase until you can immediately benefit from it.

Board Flexibility

Because it is Small, you can pivot into it with minimal disruption. This is ideal when you need to keep options open while scouting opponents.

Recommended Synergies (Explained)

Jump to full list ↓
28 Hour Fitness
Synergy Score: 2 • Shared tags: ShieldReference, DamageReference
Explore Combo Strategy →

Recommended with Orbital Polisher because both benefit from shield scaling and both push damage conversions.

Apropos Chapeau
Synergy Score: 2 • Shared tags: DamageReference, ShieldReference
Explore Combo Strategy →

Recommended with Orbital Polisher because both benefit from shield scaling and both push damage conversions.

Cosmic Plumage
Synergy Score: 2 • Shared tags: DamageReference, ShieldReference
Explore Combo Strategy →

Recommended with Orbital Polisher because both benefit from shield scaling and both push damage conversions.

Market Competition

Within the 8g price bracket, Orbital Polisher competes directly with Abacus and Loupe .

Compared to its closest rival, Orbital Polisher has a score gap of +0.0 . As a Component, it provides superior efficiency for Tool builds.

Market Analysis

Cost: 8g • Price percentile: 59% (Tool pool) • Season 10
ⓘ Method

Compared to similar Tool items, this sits around the 59th cost percentile. Use efficiency (17) and role (Component) to decide if it matches your build plan.

Efficiency: 17 Role: Component Slots: 1

Investment ROI

Estimated break-even: ~1 rounds
ⓘ Method

This is a heuristic estimate (not raw DPS). If you want it to matter, buy early enough to get multiple trigger windows before the board locks.

Timing hint: strongest when purchased before ~round 9 (due to 1 slot footprint).
Cost: 8g Est. Rounds: ~1 Model: cost ÷ (eff×2)

Positioning Guide

Trigger: global • Risk: None • Check: No

Optimal Layout

No positioning requirement (global effect).
Orbital Polisher

Placement does not change whether the effect triggers.

Why Placement Matters

Placement errors won’t nullify Orbital Polisher. Focus on board space and upgrade timing instead of slot order.

Strategic Q&A

Is Orbital Polisher worth buying early game?

"With a cost of 8g, this is typically a priority pickup. In early rounds, focus on board stability before committing to this Small item."

Does positioning matter for Orbital Polisher?

"No — this is a global item. Placement won’t affect whether it triggers. Optimize for slot efficiency and keep your grid open for higher-impact pieces."